P2P Analytics Service Halted

P2P Analytics service has been halted indefinitely. Thanks to everyone for your feedback and support. For a recommended loan selection engine, please see PeerCube or Nickelsteamroller.

 

 

June 23rd, 2013 – New Chart for subscribers: Running “delinquency rate” per Grade

There is a new chart available for subscribers: A chart showing the percentage of notes in 31-120 days late status or Default status on Lending Club. Only notes that were issued within 6 months of the chart plot date are included in the calculation. The intention of this chart is to show any short term or market-wide changes that may increase the default rates on Lending Club.

April 16th, 2013 – Dear Lending Club Investor: Adapt or your returns will suffer.

Update: LendingClub talks about this issue in this press release (dated 4/20/2013)

It’s a pretty well agreed upon fact that Lending Club‘s popularity has increased in recent months.  While it’s a great thing that Lending Club‘s loan origination rate remains high, an important realization to make is that the average loan In-Funding time has fallen significantly over the past two months. Please consider the following chart:

As you can see, the average amount of funding outstanding on notes currently in funding at any one time has been on a continually decreasing trend. What this would imply is (coupled with the ever increasing origination rate) the average time in funding is probably decreasing (assuming that the average loan size remains consistent). This thesis is confirmed in the following chart:
It is my belief that the average Lending Club investor is going to have to get more sophisticated as time goes on in terms of note identification and timely note investment in order to capture the best returns. If these current trends continue into the future, it may eventually get to the point where in funding times are measured in hours, not days – especially on the notes that are deemed attractive because of a perceived lower default risk./higher yield.
In order to begin addressing this issue, P2P Analytics has a new feature: The P2P Analytics Daily cut. The daily cut is a daily release (in html format) in which the top notes are identified via the P2P Analytics selection algorithm and are presented to subscribers for quick and easy investment. This feature is online and active now in the member’s section.

March 17th, 2013 – New Subscriber Feature – DeluxeLoanStats.csv

** This feature is now discontinued due to LendingClub providing this data for free at the current time**

Usually, when one wants to run statistical analysis on Lending Club historic loan data, one uses LoanStats.csv. The problem with LoanStats.csv is that it only includes a limited portion of the information that is available to investors via the real-time BrowseNotes6.csv file. BrowseNotes version 6 is a file that shows the details of all In Funding notes, but not notes that have already found funding. DeluxeLoanStats.csv is a feature that seeks to bypass this data problem.

Once per hour, BrowseNotes version 6 is downloaded and processed. All newly listed notes are identified. Once processed, the newly listed notes are added to an index where once a week this index is bundled line by line onto the existing LoanStats.csv. Once this file is compiled, it is released weekly to P2P Analytics subscribers.

The purpose of this new file is to allow P2P Analytics investors the ability to run their own detailed analysis with historical data that Lending Club does not regularly provide.

 

February 9th, 2013 – P2P Analytics Results update – Lending Club Default Rates

Below is a table showing the updated P2P Analytics performance statistics.

The first table compares the performance of the Average Lending Club investor to the Average P2P Analytics investor, assuming they only invested between P2P Analytics inception (August 2012) until the end of 2012.

The second table compares the performance assuming they only invested between P2P Analytics inception (August 2012) until today. So far the results of the service are favorable and prove that statistically based note selection can be profitable and minimize one’s risk of defaults. As time goes on, more detailed Lending Club investment strategies can be developed for less defaults.

A quick note on how “Theoretical defaults” was calculated: According to the Lending Club statistics page, the recovery rate for 16-30 day late notes is 77%. The recovery rate for notes 31-120 days late is 53%. The formula used for theoretical defaults in all cases is the following:  =(#.of.16-30DayLateNotes*0.23)+(#.of.31-120DayLateNotes*0.47)+(#.of.Defaults/Write offs).

 

 

 

 

 

January 21st, 2013 – Large surge in Lending Club note availability. New chart added.

Over the past week, there has been a large surge in the availability of A,B,C and even D grade notes on Lending Club. Although E,F and G grade notes have also seen increased note availability, the surge in these grades has been more muted than in the other grades. See the charts below for more detail. Note: These charts were started in November of 2012.

Could this recent surge be in part due to the new (and more forgiving) credit criteria at Lending Club? The new lending criteria can be found in the November 2012 prospectus.

A new daily chart has been added to the public charting section: Average time in funding.The purpose of this chart is to show the average time in funding for the different note grades on Lending Club. With this knowledge, investors can generally estimate how much time they have to invest after any one particular note is listed (based on its grade).

January 1st, 2013 – P2P Analytics 2012 Summary and Performance

Thanks to everyone for a great start in 2012.

P2P Analytics has been growing gradually and consistently in terms of subscribers and services provided. Here’s a list of some of the features that were added in 2012:

  •  Folio Fn suggestions based on the selection algorithm and other filters.
  • Basic, Real time, Lending Club note funding charts broken down by Grade (for subscribers) with general charts publicly available.
  • Records to track the performance of P2P Analytics suggestions.

 

Below is a summary of the performance of the P2P Analytics service for LendingClub note selection:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks again to all of the readers and subscribers – Here’s to a great 2013!

December 18th, 2012 – Is Lending Club starting to run out of riskier notes?

After keeping track of note availability for the past few weeks, one main trend has emerged: A grade notes on Lending Club are becoming very plentiful while lower grade notes are starting to become a little supply constricted. I’ll let the following two charts speak for themselves.

A grade note funding availability (22 day chart)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F&G  grade note funding availability (22 day chart)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If this trend continues, this will mark a very important shift in terms of the types of notes that are available for investors who have a higher appetite for risk. Will Lending Club have to change their issuance policies to keep up if the trend continues? Although 22 days worth of data is not enough to come to long term conclusions regarding Lending Club’s note supply, the trend so far is interesting.

December 2nd, 2012 – P2P Analytics Performance to date & Planned Updates

Over the next few weeks, further automation will be applied to all algorithms and functions of P2P Analytics. The goal is to provide more frequent updates and to start working towards custom solutions options.

A quick note regarding P2P Analytics performance to date in terms of selecting Lending Club notes:

P2P Analytics Performance to date (Service established on August 5th,2012)

Total Notes Issued 31-120 days late Defaults
Lending Club Average 22230 23 0
P2P Analytics 2080 0 0

November 27th, 2012 – Free FolioFN suggestions now available.

Every Tuesday, FolioFN suggestions based on the selection algorithm will be made public. Please see the new section at the top of this page marked “FolioFN” for details.

Note: The material presented on P2Panalytics is provided for informational purposes only and is based upon information that is considered to be reliable. However, neither P2PAnalytics nor its affiliates warrant its completeness, accuracy or adequacy and it should not be relied upon as such. Neither P2PAnalytics nor its affiliates are responsible for any errors or omissions or for results obtained from the use of this information. Past performance, including the tracking of Peer to Peer Lending notes and portfolios for educational purposes, is not necessarily indicative of future results. Anyone related to P2PAnalytics may hold positions in the notes mentioned, which may change at any time without notice. Peer to Peer lending has inherent risks and P2PAnalytics is not responsible for investment losses incurred by any of its users or readers.

This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument. Securities or other financial instruments mentioned in this material are not suitable for all investors. Any opinions expressed herein are given in good faith, are subject to change without notice, and are only intended at the moment of their issue as conditions quickly change. The information contained herein does not constitute advice on the tax consequences of making any particular investment decision. This material does not take into account your particular investment objectives, financial situations or needs and is not intended as a recommendation to you of any particular securities, financial instruments or strategies. Before investing, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.